🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be cut by over 50%, following a controversial law change that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors based on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations often spent years building community backing and urging their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to establish other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their seats.