🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."